Total Truth Radio

Magic

8 Sept 2013

Total Truth Focus On Syria - Not The Arabian Knights?





 The Three Stooges



You have to ask yourself why Barack Obama, Francois Hollande and David Cameron are so desperate to attack Syria?

There must be a reason why they are behaving the way they are, which is not on the face of it rational. There are reputations at stake here of course. When Vladimir Putin dismissed Britain as ‘just a small island no one pays any attention to’ last week (this made me laugh out loud) at the G20 summit of world leaders he was deliberately adding insult to David Cameron's injury.

The whole show descended into acrimony over US-led planned military strikes on Syria and everyone took their ball home muttering threats under their breath.

But why does Mr Obama, Mr Cameron and M.Hollande so urgently want to start hostilities against Syria? What's the deal on Syria anway?

The crossing of the Obama red line by the use of biological weapons is obviously a ruse, the US used chemical weapons in Vietnam and more recently banned ordnance like white phosphorus and most infamously depleted uranium (with devastating affects on the civilian population) in Fallujah, Iraq and that's just a couple of examples of illegal WMD use by US forces in living memory (for some). 
So nobody is buying Barack Obama's moral highground argument... that one is completely dead in the water I think.

In order to put these events into some sort of perspective from an English point of view the first largely unspoken truth is that the so-called Syrian 'civil war' is really a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and its arch-rival in the regional power game, Iran.

The US, the UK, France, Russia, Iran and indeed everyone around the world is actually reacting to that fact.
Saudi Arabia is funding and arming Sunni rebels to take down the Shia Assad regime linked to Tehran, who of course is the real target of these appalling attrocities and the human catastrophe that has been unleashed in Syria and beyond and thanks largely to Washington, now engulfing the entire area in wall-to-wall destablisation and gaping power vacuums that may not always have outcomes that suit Washington's ends.

In the middle of all this there is a slightly uncomfortable Israeli regime who of course are the arch enemy of Iran, but who aren't apparently overjoyed to have these swollen ranks of well armed Islamic fundamentalists and CIA trained Sunni terrorists bedding down rather too close for comfort.
Neither is Jerusalem happy that the escalation of violence in the region means that Syria and Hezbollah may gain access to Russian weapon technologies that would spike the Israeli guns and change the calculus of military power in the Middle East to their disadvantage.
This is how an article by Michael Wilner in the Jerusalem Post in June this year summed up the situation thus:-
"Turkey’s parliamentarians say their country is – with great misfortune – deeply invested in the conflict. Israeli politicians are nervous about the flow of arms, particularly the threat of a delivery by Russia of the S- 300 missile system that would threaten Israel’s abilility to surgically strike Hezbollah weapons transfers and would compromise any future consideration of a no-fly zone by Western powers.
Jordan’s King Abdullah II presented the American president with a map of a potential future Syria, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, divided into fiefdoms with desert lands transformed into new al-Qaida training grounds."
 

Turkey is trying to gain acceptance into the EU at the same time as trying to cope with the humanitarian disaster on its border with Syria and spreading conflict leaking over its frontiers making the Turks damned if they take either side and held responsible for the failures of Nato.
Since the Jerusalem Post was carrying a story taken from the Wall Street Journal (who'd be without a copy nowadays?) - it made sense to me to have a look at what the hedge fund managers and futures traders are telling each other about this Alice in Wonderland situation, with poor old Barack and John Kerry absolutely frantic to get the bombing started whatever anyone says, and soon they are working to someone elses timetable here, these great leaders of the western world......in his own little way David Cameron likewise!

I remember many years ago now a very well known British Communist telling me "always read the Financial Times, the capitalist class don't lie to each other like they do the rest of us" - that advice has always stood me in good stead, at least until the internet happened along... so now I can go to the Wall Street Journal website and read things like this:-

" They believed that Prince Bandar, a veteran of the diplomatic intrigues of Washington and the Arab world, could deliver what the CIA couldn't: planeloads of money and arms, and, as one U.S. diplomat put it, wasta, Arabic for under-the-table clout. Prince Bandar—for two decades one of the most influential deal makers in Washington as Saudi ambassador but who had largely disappeared from public view—is now reprising his role as a geopolitical operator. This time it is to advance the Saudi kingdom's top foreign-policy goal, defeating Syrian President Assad and his Iranian and Hezbollah allies."   


Prince Bandar previously involved in the US supported creation of Sunni fundamentalists like the Taliban in Afghanistan during the Soviet intervention and has a close relationship with Washington, especially Democrat governments as it happens going back to Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter.

This very interesting article to which I have posted a link, goes on to discuss the personal emnities that exist between the Saudi royal family and the Assad government in Damascus, the whole drama begins to take on a Shakespearian twist as according to the WSJ article :-

Saudi King Abdullah, whose mother and two of whose wives hail from a cross-border tribe influential in Syria, tried for a decade to woo Mr. Assad away from Iran's sway. He failed. The king's attitude hardened in 2011 after the Assad regime, rebuffing the king's personal advice on how to ease tension, cracked down brutally on political opponents and did so during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. The king then decided to do whatever was needed to bring down Mr. Assad, American and Arab diplomats said. 

This inter-tribal dispute which has resulted in Saudi Arabia giving the Gulf statelet Qatar the same sort of little island treatment as Russia gave Britain at G20 although obviously Qatar isn't actually an island I hope you take my point. 
The Saudi government doesn't want Qatar poking its nose into its dispute with Syria and avenging the perceived insult the secular Assad regime gave the Saudi king as the head of the Wahabi Sunni sect, local potentate and during Ramadan to boot.
The WSJ tells us that:-  
"
Prince Bandar has largely stayed out of Washington but held meetings with U.S. officials in the region. One was in September 2012. Sens. McCain and Graham, who were in Istanbul, met him in an opulent hotel suite on the banks of the Bosporus. Mr. McCain said he made the case to Prince Bandar that the rebels weren't getting the kinds of weapons they needed, and the prince, in turn, described the kingdom's plans. The senator said that in succeeding months he saw "a dramatic increase in Saudi involvement, hands-on, by Bandar." 
 In September and October, the Saudis approached Croatia to procure more Soviet-era weapons. The Saudis got started distributing these in December and soon saw momentum shift toward the rebels in some areas, said U.S. officials, Arab diplomats and U.S. lawmakers briefed on the operation. Officials in Croatia denied it was involved in weapons sales."

Enter Barack Obama already looking like a lame duck president because his health reforms are undeliverable and because nobody gave him any credence over the Snowden Affair that left him looking rather foolish on the world stage.
Worse still so far as he is concerned, loyal Washington shill David Cameron was defeated in a House of Commons revolt that wasn't supposed to happen, nobody I think was more surprised than Ed Miliband that the government was defeated on the bombing of Syria vote.
So now they are all terrified that despite GCHQ watching all of us normal people here, the Saudis who are obviously not on the Cheltenham radar will arrange for there to be a terrorist event as a reprisal, just like the deaths of thousands has been Prince Bandar's response to President Assad's perceived insult during the holy month of Ramadan.
This is why Obama, Cameron and Hollande are so incredibly jittery and ready to commmit war crimes even against the will of their own people and their own parliaments, so fearful are they of the global reach of Riyadh and the wealth it flaunts. 
But Cameron is doubly duplicitous because at the same time as his haste to please the Saudi royals he is hosting the world's largest arms fair in London this week.
A Russian government arms supplier accused of providing the Syrian regime with more than three quarters of its weaponry will be among 1,400 firms at the world’s biggest arms fair in London this week. That's how committed Cameron is to the cause of the peace in Syria and how deep his "sympathies" for the victims of US supplied chemical weapons by the terrorists the British support in the region.
.
The US and UK are rolling out the next generation of weapons for their wars at the Murder Fest in London this week, while the arms companies aim to set the agenda for still more exorbitant military spending.
The London arms fair brings together 28,000 international buyers and sellers. The deals that begin here fuel the arms trade the world over. Death, injury, fear and repression are exported from the arms companies doing their filthy trade right on our doorstep.
So as far as Syria goes then, I mean the deaths of thousands of men, women and children, the displacement of millions of people, the maimed and the sick, the poisoned and the crippled are all part of (1) a surrogate war by Saudi Arabia against Iran supported by the Washington regime; (2) a response to a perceived 'insult' to the King of Saudi Arabia by President Assad and (3) - a massive investment opportunity too good to miss for the speculators in the technology of mass murder and crimes against humaity.

What the people of this country, or any country want and expect is of absolutely no consequence whatsoever to the actors in this geopolitical theatre, in which the suffering is massive and almost beyond belief while the servile corporate media pumps out disinformation, the BBC cannot ever tell the the truth now since they announced the collapse of Building 7 on 11 September 2001 more than 20 minutes before it actually happened.
They are wedded to a lie that even the BBC paedophile scandal couldn't overshadow and which has cost the Corporation what remained of its evaporating credibility in the eyes of those who take an interest in such things.
As we approach the 12th anniversary of 9/11 all that is happening in the Middle East now makes more sense in the light of revelations exposed here, and over the years repeatedly on these pages, that 9/11 was in part an inside job, but the whole event should more probably be seen as an act of 'friendly fire' in actual fact I think.

Take a close look at Syria and the Middle East today. nothing has changed since 2001, Bush has been replaced by Obama, but in foreign policy terms they are exact clones of each other anyway.... so no advance there at all.

We live in a world governed by gangsters where nothing is what it is claimed to be.

Protesters with banners at the Excel venue
Protesters with banners gather at a demonstration outside the annual Arms Fair being hosted at the Excel venue in London Photo: DEMOTIX
 LINK -http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/defence/10296422/Lockheed-Martin-offices-targeted-by-anti-arms-trade-protesters.html

Syria is the London Arms Fair's current advertising campaign and a showroom for the monstrous instruments of death and mass destruction on sale in the British capital today. 

We are all watching the promo ahead of the main feature, we are all victims of this crass barbarity of corrupted gangster capitalism and the immoral machinations of Obama, Cameron and Hollande.... the unrelenting oponents of peace and civilisation. Time now then to make a very big fuss indeed in the West and punish the real perpetrators of war crimes that really have crossed the red line in any decent and civilised society that is!

7 comments:

  1. Good analysis as always, AA, and your segue into the dealing going on at the upcoming London Arms Market/Butcher Convention shows us, again, who the real winner is in these perpetual conflicts.


    Whatever the measure of a nation, large or small or in per capita income (for which the UK is 21st in the world and Russia close to 40th), it is clear to me that the two-year Syria is a nasty religious, sectarian and ethnic bit of business, exaggerated by the Usual Suspects.

    It's time for the international communities--those in kahoots with Saudi princess and Iranian Mullahs--to stop this. Obama's greatest fault is the pretense that the 1,400 victims of this gas attack are somehow less cruel than the 100,000 deaths of other men and women and children in Syria. His leadership hubris, of which most leaders have, created this "red line" and he must back away from it. Lo and behold Putin might actually be able to give Obama the cover. Perhaps this was the reason for the private talk they had informally last week in St Petersburg.

    If the President takes Putin up on the turning over of chemical weapons by Assad deal, this would be a great salvation from escalation.

    It's obvious most people and most politicians here do not want to go to war. Backing up a leader's off-the-cuff is the worst reason to go ahead. Of course, the Far Right loves Obama's predicament. Every President from the Democratic Party since Harry Truman has been "tested" by the Rabid Right. It starts with the "Red Scare and "Who Lost China to Communism?" debate in the late 1940's, thru the Kennedy arms build-up to the Johnson escalation in Vietnam to the vilification of Jimmy Carter for not preventing the storming of the US Embassy in Iran and Afghanistan.

    In other words, don't anyone underestimate how domestic political pressure makes all Presidents into "red line" drawers in places the USA have no direct good to offer.

    John McCain is Obama's chief goad in all this . McCain is a bit nutty, a man not happy unless he is sash-shaying about the Middle east trying to play Secretary of State in his own Mad Hatter's Tea Party Version of a world where America is the cop on the beat.

    It addition as Andrew Sullivan of Atlantic magazine points out, Russia could be guaranteed that the stockpile of Assad's chemical death delivery system would NOT fall into the hands of al-Queda jihadists who might transfer a part of it into the Muslim parts of her southern border (i.e., Dagestan) and threaten Russia's major cities.

    Putin's offer of a safety rope to Washington has met with some positive signs from Secretary of State John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and the Foreign Policy elite. It may turn out to be a thin reed rather than a rope, but one hopes Obama will seize it and end this latest round of macho gamesmanship between the Neo-Con hawks in Congress and Obama.


    It's somewhat weird to see Secretary Kerry, a former Vietnam Vets Against the War/Winter Soldier Leader in the early 1970's, turn into a rampant hawk. The years do take a toll on some of us, AA.

    I agree with the part about the Saudis and the Iranians being the second-tier proxies in this infernal mess. If Moscow can serve as some sort of honest broker and get a little commission against future terrorism inside her borders, let's hope Washington will seize it!

    So kudos to the British Parliament, the "British Street" who turned out against this expended "surgical strike" and all the US citizens who protested or called their reps and the White House and said--in clear majorities--NO to some slap to Assad that a total nutcase like Syria's leader would only propagandize into a victory anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your considered response to this post Doug, it is much appreciated. I agree with you that the 'British Street' as well as the US anti-war campaigners and many other 'ordinary people' worldwide have done all within their power to stop this madness. I personally don't see this as an equal conflict between Saudi Arbia (NATO) and Iran (Russia) taking place ob Syrian soil, I see Saudi very much as the aggressor here and Iran, via its surrogate as the victim of militaristic offensiveness by the medieval dester kingdom and its friends and sponsors. The view from the UK of US politics also differs somewhat to the way you describe it here because the Obama regime is also seen as far right I think from a European perspective, the UK pseudo-government is also of the 'rabid right' too. The fact that there is nothing to choose in my mind between these various manifestations of neo-imperialist warmongers and banker driven aggressive acquisitiveness. I don't think the historic division between left and right in postmodern politics has collapsed and no the fundamental conflict is between the corporations and the populations. The totality of human misery in Syria has been visited upon these people by the corporations represented by such trade mark figures as Barack Obama, John Kerry, David Cameron, William Hague, John McCain, Ronald McDonald and last and definitely least - Francios Hollande. They are all part of the same contagion that must be eliminated for the sake of humanity and all of nature in my view. Those elements of this neofascist onslaught against a sovereign state we are seeing in Syria (Iraq, Libya, Somalia and Afghanistan too) is an evil that cannot be allowed to survive and must be defeated by the people power. I consider President Assad as being less of a threat to the planet than Prewsident Obama by a factor of one hundred. Having said that I stand firmly on the side of anyone standing up to these monsters and plotting their ultimate downfall. The people of the US who are sane are saying no like the people everywhere and that is the side I'm on....from the outside Washington has nothing but rightwing madmen to choose from (just like London) and we the majority choose to defy them and work with any ally we can find to vanquish the evil they represent. In the current crisis we turn again to Moscow as we have in the past as the lesser evil in a diabolical world of murder, greed, war crimes and corruption.
    Thanks for putting your perspective Doug on the overall point of resisting the aggression we stand shoulder to shoulder I think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do think we are shoulder to shoulder on the main points, AA,but I have to admit the notion of elected leaders as some sort of contagion seems unduly harsh.

      Putin has put forth this proposal to keep Assad in place--perfectly in the realm of power politics. Russians have their own fears of exacerbated difficulties in places near the Caucuses region, after the long war in Chechnya that began with Boris Yeltsin's military debacle and has led to an escalation of ham-fisted attempts to bomb Grozny and outlying areas around the "autonomous republic" into a parking lot. Of course there were atrocities on both sides in that conflict, with Chechyan rebels attacking inside Russia in the 1990's, resulting in hundreds of deaths in schools. American power of course is not removed from bombing campaigns and invasions in our present times, and perhaps rather than see the leaders as a contagion it might be better to elect more leaders capable of "minding the store".

      The last thing Putin wants to see is a bunch of Sunni Wahabists and al-Queda groups seizing Syria when the balance of power in the Middle East serves them better if the Mullahs in Iran hegemonic sway in Syria and parts of Lebanon. This would only embolden Moscow old troubles in Muslim-dominated regions like the Caucuses which have been giving Russia fits since Leo Tolstoy was a pup.

      So a proposal was made and I hope it goes through,a win-win all-around and a necessary correction to Obama's "red line" over-stepping. I still prefer a four-year term President over the way things are run in Damascus or Supreme Leaders in Tehran and I think both rank-and-file Americans, English, and Russians would agree all our countries are better off staying out of Syria and out of each other's leadership struggles, especially those conducted with protests and not bullets.

      Thanks for your blog here.

      Delete
  3. I HAVE asked myself why Cameron & Co are so desperate to involve themselves in Syria. And the answers I come up with are confusing. They claim to want to go there in response to alleged attack with chemical weapons by the Syrian government against its civilian population. The fail to mention that it was the UK who provided the chemicals needed to manufacture these weapons.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/13/uk-arms-export-caution-needed

    Don’t you think it a bit odd that the UK government should first supply the chemicals and then be so outraged by their use that they want to…, actually I’m not exactly sure what is it that they want? They call it ‘military intervention’, but they haven’t said exactly what that means. Are they going to indiscriminately bomb areas of Syria they consider to be government strongholds? and if so what if any provisions are there to avoid civilian casualties? Obviously there are no provisions to avoid civilian casualties, and even if there were what do they class as ‘innocent civilians’? For example are the thousands of young children who work in the ammunition factories in Syria ‘innocent civilians’? Or are they part of the war machine and a legitimate target?
    And where does Russia fit into all of this? One of their senior Olympic officials, Oligarch and multi millionaire Vladimir Lisin used his own shipping company to transport a huge cargo of weapons to Syria.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9321536/The-Russian-oligarch-in-Britain-and-ship-taking-arms-to-Syria.html

    I can’t see that being done without the knowledge and consent of the Russian government and NOW this same Russian government are busting a gut to appear the peacemaker and broker a disarmament deal that would avoid military intervention. So, first the chemicals are shipped from the UK to Syria and then the UK government claim their use is justification for military intervention, then Russia ships a load of weapons out there and then decided to play peace maker by asking Syria to hand over their weapons. And you say….. have you asked yourself why?? Ummmmmmmmm yes I have.
    In Obamas recent speech he said; ‘’let me assure you America does not do ‘pinprick’ strikes’’. I took this to mean that when they go in as I’m sure they will, they will throw every thing they have at Syria and make little if any attempt to limit the carnage inflicted.
    Conspicuous by its absence is any attempt by any one to say how they expect a Syrian government to be formed post ‘military intervention’. And we all know where that leads. To me it simply looks as if Syria is the latest pawn in the international power struggle, we are all fed a heap of lies and no matter what happens the people of Syria are the loosers those who already hold the power are the winners.

    Aaron this was an excellent report, sorry if this response went on a bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems to me, Loretta, that there are several sides in the last few years trying to play a game of "Risk" with the people of Syria. Many sides have complicity in this as you have pointed out, which makes it all the thornier to solve because it the people of Syria are reduced to the status of chess pieces. But I also think Assad's own ruthless suppression of peaceful reform movements in 2011 has been a major catalyst for all the bad things that have come ahead. I don't think anyone who dissents from the Assad family dynasty ends up well--hence the reason for the extremists taking over the anti-Alawite alliance.

      Power sharing in Syria seems to be a huge stumbling block, as it has turned out to be in Egypt.

      Delete
  4. Thanks Loretta and Doug for re-emphasing the seemingly contradictory behaviour of some of the actors in this situation, if Saudi sharia law now dominates Western foreign policy we will be in for a few more Monty Python moments usually with lethal outcomes in the future I think.
    I absolutely agree that the situation is not at all sensible, it doesn't seem to follow the law of reason, but there is a backstory of course that is probably even more complex and convoluted than the main feature.
    I think the picture becomes somewhat more clarified when the role of 'contractors' are taken into account. Another more detailed blueprint or perhaps wish list exists in PNAC which gives the broad policy agenda of the US-led 'west' which is militaristic and expansionist. Another factor that helps give some shape to the present crisis are corporate 'think tanks' like the Jamestown Foundation http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/ and the Caucasus Fund.
    The Jamestown Foundation is part of a neo-conservative network that re-branded itself after the Cold War from being anti-Soviet and anti-Communist to one that is anti-Russian and “pro-democracy.” The network not only consists of Jamestown and the Caucasus Fund but also other groups funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Open Society Institute (OSI).
    These organisations are deeply implicated in what is happening in Syria now, but they aren't being interviewed by the BBC nor splashed over the front pages of the tabloids.

    On the point you make about the Lison connection Loretta when you say:-

    "I can’t see that being done without the knowledge and consent of the Russian government and NOW this same Russian government are busting a gut to appear the peacemaker and broker a disarmament deal that would avoid military intervention."

    This is not necessarilly the case I don't think. Putin's relationship with the oligarchs is another set of contradictions but I think there are two types of oligarch, the legal and the 'criminal' so far as Moscow is concerned, the dividing line doesn't seem to be fixed. Putin has deprived some of these oligarchs of their priviledges....as Wikipedia points out a "significant number of Russian oligarchs have bought homes in upscale sections of London, United Kingdom, which has been dubbed "Moscow on Thames" ......

    I don't see this Syrian conflict as morally equal, I don't doubt that Russia's leaders like all other governments are acting in their own best interests, but I don't think the blame for the hostilities lies with them at all.
    Syria like Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Libya and Egypt has been destablised by foreign intervention, 40 years of comparative stability in the Persian Gulf has been shattered by foreign interests and interference. I think the disparity between Russian military bases abroad and US/NATO ones says it all really.
    I also think that despite all the half truths, distortions and downright lies in the corporate media we know who the aggressor is and who is the victim.
    Historians of the previous two world wars are usually quite clear on that point if non other, it is only the psyops that make it harder to call in world war three at this time, but not all that difficult really.
    Without romanticising or 'bigging-up' Russia I think if we are forced to ask ourselves who is the bigger threat to world peace in the 21st century, then the declining Anglo-American/NATO/Zionist Empire is the undisputed contender for the "warmonger of the century" title this time around.
    It was Hitler and Hirohito in the last century.... it is Obama, Cameron and Hollande today and I believe when all the dust settles on the chaos they have wrought this will be the verdict of history on this woeful trio of corporate hitmen too.

    No more space here to carry on, thanks again both for developing the discussion on this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like your sober assessment of the situation regarding Putin and the Oligarchs, AA. This is not an era for romantic notions of any side, of that one thing I am certain.

    I liked to see more American "bases" at home, freeing up money for the domestic economy we need to invest in for the future of cities like Detroit and Chicago.


    Points taken on this side. The expansion of private contraction into military affairs (like Dick Cheney's Haliburton) has screwed over whatever goodwill on international affairs the US had in many places.

    I'll also have to take a look at this "Jamestown Foundation", AA, and "The Caucasus Group".

    ReplyDelete