| The Manufacture of Consent and Dissent - or Oh No, Not Cognitive Infiltration Already? | for everyone |
Art by www.artsyhome.com
History Tour - False Flag Manhattan - The Wall Street Bombing and Charlie Veitch
Having recently seen the celebrity self-styled anarchist of the Love Police and YouTube heart throb Charlie Veitch announce to the world, from the very heart of Manhattan that he has "changed his mind on 9/11" got me thinking about the surprising propensity for false flag operations in the City of New York.
There was Charlie having built up a reputation for cheeky little pops at the elite and courageous disputations with often multiples of police officers and security personnel, he has been working up to this for quite a while. I became suspicious of Charlie's larger than life antics and clearly very well funded lifestyle quite a while ago and have posted a few challenges on his site which of course he has not ever responded to.
Apparently Charlie has had a conversion on the road to Damascus so to speak, although for the Obama administration they are already marching down that road anyway, but it wasn't Syria where this miracle took place ....it was Manhattan, the false flag capital of the world.
Charlie says he has new evidence but not what this evidence is. We are all interested in evidence and that is why we listen to for example the AE 9/11 Truth movement and look at the evidence they have released that proves Charlie Veitch is just quite simply wrong.
But never mind rehearsing all those tired old arguments about who did 9/11 and why, the controlled demolitions and the complete absence of intercepting aircraft on the northeast seaboard of the United States for the first time since aviation was invented....we needn't go over all that stuff yet again, Charlie really is yesterday's man if he thinks that's what captures hearts and minds today.
We know what we know and now we've moved on.
No, I'm going back a bit further than all that, back in history to where the current modus operandii of contemporary attacks upon US/Nato forces actually originated, the world's very first roadside bomb which happened to be detonated on 16 September 1920 in the Financial District of New York City.
'The Wall Street Bombing was an act of murderous urban terrorism that was at the time, blamed on Italian anarchists who had allegedly prior to the bombing carried out an unsuccessful letter bomb attack on banking magnate JP Morgan.
Morgan had incidentally made astronomical profits out of the First World War.
As Morgan's Wikipedia entry points out;-
His firm was the official purchasing agent for the British government, buying cotton, steel, chemicals and food. Morgan organized a syndicate of about 2200 banks and floated a loan of $500,000,000 to the Allies. The British sold off their holdings of American securities and by late 1916 were dependent on unsecured loans for further purchases.'
This event symbolises the passing over of the British empire to the mythical kingdom of Greater Bilderbergia the bank as the supranational sovereign entity and the birth of the virtual corporatocracy
After the war, Morgan made several trips to Europe to investigate and report on financial conditions there. By the 1920s, Guaranty had become one of the world's most important banking institutions, as a leading lender to Germany and Europe. He worked extremely hard to defeat Franklin D. Roosevelt's plan for the New Deal during The Depression, and secured about USD$100 million in loans to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini prior to World War II
So it fitted well with the picture of an anarchist attack on the heart of capitalism at the epicentre of the global baking system after 1918. Who could be more vicious and less patriotic than Italian anarchists as portrayed in the popular press?
Morgan's future relationship with Italian fascist Mussolini was a marriage made in heaven you might say!
A message was found in a nearby mailbox reading: "Free the political prisoners. Or it will be sure death for all of you. American Anarchist Fighters." (The previous day, anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti had been indicted for bank robbery and murder.)
At noon Friday, Sept. 17, led by the Sons of the American Revolution, thousands of New Yorkers rallied in front of the boarded-up windows of 23 Wall St.They sang America the Beautiful and listened to a patriotic speech from World War I hero Brig. Gen. William J. Nicholson.
There was Charlie having built up a reputation for cheeky little pops at the elite and courageous disputations with often multiples of police officers and security personnel, he has been working up to this for quite a while. I became suspicious of Charlie's larger than life antics and clearly very well funded lifestyle quite a while ago and have posted a few challenges on his site which of course he has not ever responded to.
Apparently Charlie has had a conversion on the road to Damascus so to speak, although for the Obama administration they are already marching down that road anyway, but it wasn't Syria where this miracle took place ....it was Manhattan, the false flag capital of the world.
Charlie says he has new evidence but not what this evidence is. We are all interested in evidence and that is why we listen to for example the AE 9/11 Truth movement and look at the evidence they have released that proves Charlie Veitch is just quite simply wrong.
But never mind rehearsing all those tired old arguments about who did 9/11 and why, the controlled demolitions and the complete absence of intercepting aircraft on the northeast seaboard of the United States for the first time since aviation was invented....we needn't go over all that stuff yet again, Charlie really is yesterday's man if he thinks that's what captures hearts and minds today.
We know what we know and now we've moved on.
No, I'm going back a bit further than all that, back in history to where the current modus operandii of contemporary attacks upon US/Nato forces actually originated, the world's very first roadside bomb which happened to be detonated on 16 September 1920 in the Financial District of New York City.
'The Wall Street Bombing was an act of murderous urban terrorism that was at the time, blamed on Italian anarchists who had allegedly prior to the bombing carried out an unsuccessful letter bomb attack on banking magnate JP Morgan.
Morgan had incidentally made astronomical profits out of the First World War.
As Morgan's Wikipedia entry points out;-
His firm was the official purchasing agent for the British government, buying cotton, steel, chemicals and food. Morgan organized a syndicate of about 2200 banks and floated a loan of $500,000,000 to the Allies. The British sold off their holdings of American securities and by late 1916 were dependent on unsecured loans for further purchases.'
This event symbolises the passing over of the British empire to the mythical kingdom of Greater Bilderbergia the bank as the supranational sovereign entity and the birth of the virtual corporatocracy
After the war, Morgan made several trips to Europe to investigate and report on financial conditions there. By the 1920s, Guaranty had become one of the world's most important banking institutions, as a leading lender to Germany and Europe. He worked extremely hard to defeat Franklin D. Roosevelt's plan for the New Deal during The Depression, and secured about USD$100 million in loans to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini prior to World War II
So it fitted well with the picture of an anarchist attack on the heart of capitalism at the epicentre of the global baking system after 1918. Who could be more vicious and less patriotic than Italian anarchists as portrayed in the popular press?
Morgan's future relationship with Italian fascist Mussolini was a marriage made in heaven you might say!
A message was found in a nearby mailbox reading: "Free the political prisoners. Or it will be sure death for all of you. American Anarchist Fighters." (The previous day, anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti had been indicted for bank robbery and murder.)
At noon Friday, Sept. 17, led by the Sons of the American Revolution, thousands of New Yorkers rallied in front of the boarded-up windows of 23 Wall St.They sang America the Beautiful and listened to a patriotic speech from World War I hero Brig. Gen. William J. Nicholson.
How very effective this improvised explosive device was, the scene was like a battlefield with the dead and dying all around an eyewitness report describes a woman's head still wearing a hat was stuck to the wall of a building.
Carlo Tresca, a well-known anarchist, was hauled in for questioning.
Police also detained Edward Fischer, a well-born eccentric and former New York City tennis champion. The mentally imbalanced Fischer had mailed postcards from Toronto to friends in New York, in which he had apparently predicted the bombings. He was ultimately sent to Bellevue Hospital. Nobody ever credibly claimed responsibility for the attack. And no person was ever charged in the deadly bombing, which resulted in 39 casualties and about $2 million in property damage.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10001305/previous-terror-on-wall-street--a-look-at-a-1920-bombing.html
So how fitting it is that Charlie Veitch self proclaimed anarchist should be back on the streets of Manhattan in 2011, but now batting for other side it seems.
I always thought Charlie was too much of an actor to be on the level really, but how appropriate that he travel to new York to make a video claiming to support the 'cock-up' theory of what happened on 11 September 2001 as part of a deal he seems to have with a media outlet in America.
Who funds Charlie's exploits, his Love Police activities that would be very interesting to know I think?
Don't bother looking for an answer in Wikipedia, Charlie has no entry there which may or may not be surprising for a celebrity anarchist whose YouTube channel boasts as I type this rather impressive set of viewing data for Mr Veitch's Love Police channel:-
Channel Views:
Police also detained Edward Fischer, a well-born eccentric and former New York City tennis champion. The mentally imbalanced Fischer had mailed postcards from Toronto to friends in New York, in which he had apparently predicted the bombings. He was ultimately sent to Bellevue Hospital. Nobody ever credibly claimed responsibility for the attack. And no person was ever charged in the deadly bombing, which resulted in 39 casualties and about $2 million in property damage.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10001305/previous-terror-on-wall-street--a-look-at-a-1920-bombing.html
So how fitting it is that Charlie Veitch self proclaimed anarchist should be back on the streets of Manhattan in 2011, but now batting for other side it seems.
I always thought Charlie was too much of an actor to be on the level really, but how appropriate that he travel to new York to make a video claiming to support the 'cock-up' theory of what happened on 11 September 2001 as part of a deal he seems to have with a media outlet in America.
Who funds Charlie's exploits, his Love Police activities that would be very interesting to know I think?
Don't bother looking for an answer in Wikipedia, Charlie has no entry there which may or may not be surprising for a celebrity anarchist whose YouTube channel boasts as I type this rather impressive set of viewing data for Mr Veitch's Love Police channel:-
Channel Views:
2,157,113
Total Upload Views:
7,336,172
Subscribers:
51,552
With more than 7 million upload views, I think Charlie really does deserve a bit of a biographical note in Wiki, its not like as if he is shy or anything like that, after all he has posted more than 300 videos on YouTube staring nobody but himself, so not what you'd call a private sort of person really, our Charlie is no shrinking violet.
Its not that I'm jealous that my YouTube Channel has 51, 521 fewer subscribers than Charlie can boast, but it does illustrate the industrial scale of his output for which funds must indeed be abundant. So how does he do it?
Some unkind fellow on the internet has said that Charlie's father has something to do with the oil industry, his girlfriend said to be an Oxbridge student, his past reported to be in finance, public school and the military according to internet gossips I have read, but there are no real or hard facts, not much firm detail and so he is a mystery man.
Whether all or none of these bits of tittle tattle about Charlie are true, the fact is that you cannot go around getting yourself arrested (allegedly) and making videos all day, every day if you have to work for a living - unless being a dissent prefect is your job of course, and that seems to be the direction the wind is blowing for good old Charlie.
It just struck me to be a delicious irony that a photogenic celebrity alternative media 'anarchist' is doing the job previously done by the unpatriotic, demonic, ugly and scheming Italian anarchists for the PSYOP jockeys (PR teams) and Wall Street types generally.
The relationship between Charlie Veitch the actor and Greater Bilderbergia is one of mutual benefit it seems, by which attempts to rewrite history are inserted into the discourse on the internet and jokers and comics, cheeky chappies and show offs, try to divert our attention from what is true and what are demonstrable facts.
One lesson I've learned from all this is to avoid Manhattan in September, that's the month the bankers historically detonate the bombs there, it is obviously false flag month in Manhattan.
So what is happening here really?
Well here is a biit of a clue from Cass R. Sunstein wh is an American legal scholar, particularly in the fields of constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, and law and behavioral economics....and who currently is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration. Once again our old friend
Wikipedia helps us out here:-
For a sensible discussion of the real evidence for what took place in Manhattan on 9/11 just go to this link and hear the evidence for controlled demolition. Veitch says he has new evidence from no less an authority than Richard Gage himself, here is what Mr Gage says Mr Veitch offers no evidence whatsoever, and so another anarchist icon turns out to be no more that another spoilt brat of the bourgeoisie. Oh well, thank heavens we aren't looking for a spokesperson!
Charlie Veitch seems to be the new Bob Hope.
With more than 7 million upload views, I think Charlie really does deserve a bit of a biographical note in Wiki, its not like as if he is shy or anything like that, after all he has posted more than 300 videos on YouTube staring nobody but himself, so not what you'd call a private sort of person really, our Charlie is no shrinking violet.
Its not that I'm jealous that my YouTube Channel has 51, 521 fewer subscribers than Charlie can boast, but it does illustrate the industrial scale of his output for which funds must indeed be abundant. So how does he do it?
Some unkind fellow on the internet has said that Charlie's father has something to do with the oil industry, his girlfriend said to be an Oxbridge student, his past reported to be in finance, public school and the military according to internet gossips I have read, but there are no real or hard facts, not much firm detail and so he is a mystery man.
Whether all or none of these bits of tittle tattle about Charlie are true, the fact is that you cannot go around getting yourself arrested (allegedly) and making videos all day, every day if you have to work for a living - unless being a dissent prefect is your job of course, and that seems to be the direction the wind is blowing for good old Charlie.
It just struck me to be a delicious irony that a photogenic celebrity alternative media 'anarchist' is doing the job previously done by the unpatriotic, demonic, ugly and scheming Italian anarchists for the PSYOP jockeys (PR teams) and Wall Street types generally.
The relationship between Charlie Veitch the actor and Greater Bilderbergia is one of mutual benefit it seems, by which attempts to rewrite history are inserted into the discourse on the internet and jokers and comics, cheeky chappies and show offs, try to divert our attention from what is true and what are demonstrable facts.
One lesson I've learned from all this is to avoid Manhattan in September, that's the month the bankers historically detonate the bombs there, it is obviously false flag month in Manhattan.
So what is happening here really?
Well here is a biit of a clue from Cass R. Sunstein wh is an American legal scholar, particularly in the fields of constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, and law and behavioral economics....and who currently is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration. Once again our old friend
Wikipedia helps us out here:-
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled "Conspiracy Theories," dealing with the risks and possible government responses to false conspiracy theories resulting from "cascades" of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence.
In this article they wrote, "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s anti-terrorism policies, whatever the latter may be."
They go on to propose that, "the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups", where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting "nongovernmental officials"; they suggest that "government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes," further warning that "too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed."
Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, "might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves.
There is a trade-off between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts." This position has been criticized by some commentators,who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.
Sunstein and Vermeule's proposed infiltrations have also been met by sharply critical scholarly critiques.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_SunsteinFor a sensible discussion of the real evidence for what took place in Manhattan on 9/11 just go to this link and hear the evidence for controlled demolition. Veitch says he has new evidence from no less an authority than Richard Gage himself, here is what Mr Gage says Mr Veitch offers no evidence whatsoever, and so another anarchist icon turns out to be no more that another spoilt brat of the bourgeoisie. Oh well, thank heavens we aren't looking for a spokesperson!
Charlie Veitch seems to be the new Bob Hope.
