The Archaeology of Postmodern America Part 1

In the Beginning There Was 9/11

The "world government" at  play  - Yeah Right!

From the very beginning it was clear to me that the events that took place in the United States on 11 September 2001 were not what they were claimed to be at the time nor since that fateful day. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to see that a repeated and drawn out multi-event airborne attack on America would under normal circumstances have caused air defences to have been scrambled.


However, back in 2004 the 9/11 Commission determined that on the morning of September 11, the FAA did not adequately notify NORAD of the hijackings of Flights 11, 175, 77 or 93 in time for escort aircraft to reach the hijacked flights.
This to me was the first and most obvious flaw in the official alibi. I smelt a rat almost immediately when the first shock of the events had worn off and what happened could be reviewed and analysed in retrospect. Why were the F-15s not scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base just 10 miles from Washington DC when the Pentagon came under attack and still no interceptors turned up...who exactly do they think they are kidding? After all:-

These were well-practiced hijack routines. With more than 4,500 aircraft continuously sharing US airspace, between September 2000 and June 2001 the Pentagon launched fighters on 67 occasions to escort wayward aircraft. [FAA news release, Aug 9, 2002; Associated Press Aug 13, 2002]

  

Not on 9/11 though oddly enough. Since then the evidence has slowly and painstakingly emerged that really demonstrates beyond any possible shadow of a doubt that the official 9/11 account is fabricated and in every important detail completely untrue. I think this has had an interesting effect upon the corporate media propaganda outlets worldwide who like our own dear old BBC are locked into a lie they simply cannot escape from. The secret has long been out of course, so these broadcasters cannot stop repeating the disinformation that has led to their collapse in credibility. The BBC who reported the impossible collapse of Building Seven more than 20 minutes before it actually happened has so much egg all over its face that even complicity in the Jimmy Savile paedophile scandal could not erase the stain.

The majority of world opinion now knows that every BBC newscaster, every previously respected interviewer is a bare faced liar and this has done untold damage to the Beeb and many other mainstream media channels.

It is not only the media that has lost credibility here however, it is also the government and indeed the whole 'establishment' all shamefacedly repeating lies that no thinking person can possibly believe and very few non-thinking person's ever actually hear or even care about.

F-15 an obvious missing link in the 9/11mass murder and robbery trail

Here is a somewhat more reliable source of information in my view, simply because unlike the official story it is logical and makes sense. In a crime as well planned and executed as this one, naturally no one account can be said to be 100 per cent accurate. I don't really think that can be said about any man-made construct least of all a forensic investigation into a network of lies, disinformation and false trails laid by a powerful gang of international criminals.

But I am happy that there are enough known facts in the video below to make it by the very same balance of probabilities that finds the BBC wanting, there is truth in this, a more accurate and well researched account than anything we'll ever hear from Jeremy Paxman about 9/11 on Newsnight or anyone on anywhere else on British television.

The stratas of disinformation makes the study of modern America, the self appointed world government residing there and the biggest crime of not just this, but any century... very much akin to prehistoric events shrouded by time and covered by detritus.

The only way we can put the global role of America today into a proper historical context is to adopt an archaeological perspective and scrape away each layer of implausability to reveal what really took place before, during and after 9/11.

I think this film helps to assemble the findings to date from a variety of forensic historians, scientist, engineers, aviation experts and other interested parties and place them into some sort of logical order.

I think conspiracy theories are always pretty easy to spot and there are a few doing the rounds as always of course, but this isn't one of them... it is in my view a short film well worth watching for any student of world events and geopolitics. 

Maybe you don't agree with some aspects of the story presented here. I would be interested to hear which specifics people think are contentious in this report and why that is, but the evidence is really now so strong that the account we have here is a closer approximation to the truth than anything you'll ever find in the corporate mainsteam  media.

The ultimate result of 9/11 has been a massive, global and ever spreading legitimation crisis for the tumbling house of lies that can never tell the truth, but still tries to rather pathetically I think profess authority and insights that informed opinion just does not share. One of the side effects has been that organisations like the BBC have seen their propaganda value significantly degraded and have largely been neutralised as an effective propaganda mouthpiece of the British government and by proxy its Washington overseers. 

I don't usually post videos of this length (39 minutes) which I realise is quite a big ask in the short attention span environment most blogs are designed for, but I really think it is well worth watching it, for the concise literature review it provides of what is actually known of that momentous event in a distant (some say mythical) land of democratic America in the days before the propaganda machine over played its hand and before the gangster coup of 2001 changed everything. As someone very clever once said  just follow the money and you can't go wrong.