An Auntie From Hell - How Evil is the BBC?

In order to watch live to air television in the United Kingdom you are required to have a television license which is a sort of tax to support the British Broadcasting Corporation. I don't have a television licence myself because I don't have a television, but I do watch play again TV programmes on the internet including those shown by the BBC.

This is perfectly legal and in my own opinion more than that, it is a moral stand because there is evidence that the BBC has colluded with some of the most heinous crimes of the last 50 years at least and I am not minded to subsidise it any longer.
Interestingly the BBC stands accused of complicity in the two activities that generate the most hysteria in this country andno doubt abroad and which lie at the centre of the greatest 21st century moral panics, namely paedophilia and terrorism.
Because of this double offence to public sensibilities some people have witheld their license fee with a view to using their own subsequent prosecution as a platform to reveal the sheer malevolence of the Corporation, known affectionantely here for years as Auntie.

The BBC is of course the propaganda mouthpiece of the British establishment and has evolved from the clipped received pronunciation of the early 20th century colonialists, to the warm aural treacle of reassuring platitudes and subtly slanted perspectives that comfort and informs us with its warm impartial glow of  fair play and a finely measured reasonableness today. Well that's the intention anyway.

Everything in Auntie's garden was pretty well rosy until she fell in with the wrong crowd under Mr Blair's tenure of corruption as Governor of Airstrip One back in 2001.

We have perhaps always known Auntie was prone to spin a few yarns, she was always a flighty old bird, but generally we forgave her because we liked the drama and the comedy, the documentaries, sport and current affairs she put on to keep us entertained. We liked the way they gave George Orwell a job and John Peel too, the Beeb used to enjoy the image of being moderately cool, slightly quirky but basically solid, not any more though!

Orwell's Room 101 the home of all horror was a conference room at the then BBC headquarters Broadcasting House where tedious meeting droned on, which to a man with as little time as Orwell had was indeed torture. This of course is same Broadcasting House as the well known incestuous paedophile and bisexual bestiality practitioner whilst also being a truly great  stone carver, the paraphilic Eric Gill decorated with images from the classics back in 1934.

Prospero and Ariel by Eric Gill

We should have suspected something then I suppose, but it took disk jockey Jimmy Savile to really upset the applecart.

Auntie has been caught with her hand in the cookie jar, she has been exposed as the BBCIA a transatlanticist psychological operations conduit and that is where things started to go decidedly wrong for Auntie.

On 11 September 2001 the BBC anounced the collapse of WTC Building Seven 23 minutes before it was demolished and collapsed into its own footprint for no apparent reason on that terrible day when almost 3,000 people were vapourised in the twin towers infernos.

The premature report demonstrates fore knowledge of "the plan" of whoever organised the controled demolitions, indeed the almost total pulverisation of these massive concrete and steel structures.

I can't see what other construction can we put on this amazing  faux pas?

 The campaign to set the record straight on what really happened on that day 12 years ago has gone to court on the matter in Magistrates' Court in Horsham, Sussex earlier this year. This case came about when a man called Tony Rooke refused to pay his TV license fee on the grounds that the BBC is a terrorist organisation and it would be unlawful for him to do so. Mr Rooke made a spirited defence of his reasoning and partially won the case. District Judge Stephen Nicholls responded:

 “This is not a public inquiry into 9/11. This is an offence under section 363 of the Communications Act.” The judge added that  he “did not believe he had the power to rule under the terrorism act” but agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case and thus found him not guilty.  He was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee. 

The story is in the video below.

Around this time last year Damian Thomson in the Tory broadsheet The Telegraph commenting on the BBC paedophile scandal saring from revelations of the extent of Jimmy Savile's activities in the sex slavery trade said:-

Let me quickly spell out a couple of things that have emerged from the revelations about Sir Jimmy Savile's disgusting sexual activities.

First, the BBC over a period of decades turned a deaf ear to rumours that one of its biggest stars was groping and raping underage girls.

Second, the BBC moved vulnerable children into the orbit of a man rumoured to be a child molester.

Third, the BBC suppressed a Newsnight report revealing that it employed and enabled a celebrity paedophile – using public money to do so.

This is a huge scandal. So far, only the surface has been scratched.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100183437/jimmy-savile-the-bbc-was-at-the-centre-of-a-shocking-paedophile-cover-up/

So far the scandal has been pretty muted, hardly surprising really when the BBC is reporting itself, but the credibility of the BBC is holed below the waterline. It is a fascinating expression of instant karma I think, to use a Lennonism, that the very moral panic the media fan with sensationalist reporting and a guilty salaciousness that attracts widespread attention is the very same petard as upon which the BBC has hanged itself.

Death and smut are sure-fire sellers but that only works when it is not the accused who is creating the news from their own perpsective and transparently telling us lies about what they want us to see, hear and think.

BBC Coat of Arms

Having said all that I still like to watch or listen to some BBC programmes, not all of it is yet completely corrupted and dumbed down, but a lot of it is, the BBC is now more than ever a Curates Egg where the good is amongst the best but the bad is as bad as it gets....and that is very very bad indeed.

Some years ago I wrote to the BBC to complain that their world tv channel BBC World was so bad it is embarrassing to watch it abroad and suggested they look at CNN and DeutcheWelle to get some ideas about how they could make their station better. I never had a reply, but I did genuinely feel I had to give them feedback on how below par their television world service is, compared with the radio world service which can be enjoyed on a gentle propaganda basis and the pleasure of listening to Lilli Bulero as a forthright expression of protestantism and nationalism especially in England, but actually right across the British archipelago.

The reputation and standing of the BBC has been irrevocably damaged by all this stuff, it now ranks alongside Radio Pyongyang as the dubious state mouthpiece of the transatlanic fantasy empire of Greater Bilberbergia Radio 5 Live News is often little more than a CIA phone in show ....or somebody from the civil service pretending to be something or somebody else who knows what? 

I can only conclude from what I have seen and heard with my own eyes and ears that the question how evil is the BBC can only be responded to with in some parts very. Only a full confession can now save the BBC from the ignomy it faces, but while it denies its crimes and compounds lies with more lies the BBC is locked into a descending spiral downwards from which there is no escape possible. Every September the BBC is compelled to repeat its lies and at the same time more and more people look upon Auntie with disdain and contempt. As a propaganda source it is seriously undermined, if it were a financial institution it would have lost its A rating, but as a media corporation it limps on out of control and minus any self respect looking pretty stupid in the eyes of the world, sad is what the BBC has become, very, very sad.