Total Truth Radio

Magic

26 Jan 2013

Man of War is Prince of Peace - And the Beat Goes On

Ugandan First Lady Janet Museveni, First Lady Michele Obama,
 Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, and President Barack Obama.


"War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength." George Orwell 

In the aftermath of the swearing in of Barack Obama  for a second term as president of the United States on 20 January, I return to the idea from my earlier post on Multiply in November 2008 that was written after Obama was first elected, namely that it was deemed to be in the strategic interests of the United States to have a black African president, in the post-Bush phase of American neo-imperialism. 

At the time I wrote:-

"So while there is dancing in the streets in America and across the world because Barack Obama has seemingly swept away the bad old days of Bush and US militarism, the sad truth is that this event has extended and developed that militarism in the newly promoted African theatre of operations."


Well, things have moved on since I posted that blog, the most stable and advanced economy in Africa, Gaddafi's Libya has been bombed into the Middle Ages and is now a political and social basket case, thanks to the Obama adminsitration, its Wall Street backers and it's NATO surrogates.

The 2008 blog mentioned the developing 'push for Africa' as the final frontier for capitalism to expand and where new forms of exploitation will create unprecedented wealth in the hands of the few. This has been borne out by history, as has my conviction throughout the last presidential race that Obama would win, even when planted stories in the corporate media suggested otherwise as the cliffhanger PSYOP kicked in toward the end of the so-called "race".

Obama's record has been as I predicted marked by increased violence abroad and the ongoing and unrelenting extension of US theatres of war reflecting Washington's global ambitions.

The Obama regime has been particularly associated in increased assassination by CIA drones. On February 4, 2002, the first killer-drone strike occurred in Afghanistan. Since then there have been approximately 423 similar attacks, 52 authorized by George W. Bush and the balance by Obama. 

The increased use of drones by the Washington regime reflects war weariness at home and the political unsustanability of continued military losses abroad. There is positive evidence that US drones have committed war crimes, in that they have targetted civilian rescuers and even funeral parties in an ongoing terror campaign in areas as far apart as Yemen and Pakistan.

Recent research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has found that since Obama took office three years ago.... "between 282 and 535 civilians have been credibly reported as killed including more than 60 children.  A three month investigation including eye witness reports has found evidence that at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims. More than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners. The tactics have been condemned by leading legal experts.......
Privately some senior US military officers say they are extremely uncomfortable at the way the administration is carrying out these operations using the CIA which is not covered by laws of war or the Geneva Convention. The use of drones outside a declared war zone is seen by many legal experts as setting a dangerous precedent. Aside from allies such as Israel, Britain and France, other countries have drone technology including China, Russia and Pakistan. Iran recently captured a downed US drone."

 Mr Obama and his friends at the CIA heve massively increased drone attacks and opened a whole new extra-judicial execution arena by remote control video murder games which also happen to be crimes against humanity. But really the regime's use of drones is only the tip of the iceberg, making up less than 10 percent of at least 20,130 air strikes the U.S. has conducted in other countries since President Obama's inauguration in 2009. 

 The Obama administration is responsible for at least 18,274 air strikes in Afghanistan since 2009, including at least 1,160 by pilotless drones. The U.S. conducted at least 116 air strikes in Iraq in 2009 and about  1,460 of NATO's 7,700 strikes in Libya in 2011. While the U.S. military does not publish figures on "secret" air and drone strikes in other countries, press reports detail a five-fold increase over Bush's second term, with at least  303 strikes in Pakistan125 in Yemen and 16 in Somalia.

So, all the evidence is clear Barack Obama is a man of war and not a man of peace, even if in a supreme act of cynicism and political posturing he was sworn in this week on Martin Luther King's bible.....King must be spinning in his grave.

But all that is just posturing for the domestic audience who live on the promise of jam tomorrow... while things only get worse for many victims of the artificially manufactured 'recession' which is the cover for the greatest rip-off of all time.



Obama and co are going for broke, they want everything and they will do anything to get it.
This brings us back to Africa, the new battelground and the location for a largely surrogate World War Three that is actually already happening there and has been for quite some time.

Africa is rich in oil, gas, gold, silver, diamonds, uranium, iron, copper, tin, lead, nickel, coal, cobalt, bauxite, wood, coltan, manganese, chromium, vanadium-bearing titanium, and much, much more as well... including plentiful cheap labour.

In 2007 the US military created  a newly resourced AFRICOM.... the full spectrum invasion force and the strategy to sieze these priceless riches by force.



Commenting upon the scramble for Africa in which the US is trying to destabilise the existing Chinese relationship with African countries, Stephen Lendman writes in Global Research, December 26, 2012:-

CIA elements operate covertly virtually everywhere. So do US special forces in 120 or more countries. Fifty-four nations comprise Africa. 
In 2013, the Pentagon plans sending “small teams” to over 35 of them. Perhaps they’re already in most of the other 19.
Reports about their role limited to training and equipping efforts don’t wash. US forces everywhere are combat trained and ready.
Special forces are assassins. They specialize in search and destroy, extrajudicial assassinations, and other lawless acts.
Washington wants unchallenged African dominance. AFRICOM was established to rape the continent’s riches. Proxy and direct wars are prioritized. Expect much more in resource-rich areas.

As the first African/American president starts his second term let us not for one minute assume that this has anything to do with American civil rights, or Martin Luther King....that is just propaganda and disinformation.
The reason for Barack Obama's meteoric rise to statesmanship is that he is the mascot of AFRICOM and part of the same PNAC programme that carves up the world and is currently invading Mali.

Obama's first term was characterised by a long trail of broken promises at home and ever widening trail of bloodshed and destruction abroad.

Meanwhile just in case you thought that the Obama regime reserves its crimes against humanity for those living in other countries, think again. In the farcical drama surrounding the “fiscal cliff,” PSYOP...the renewal of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA)—the 2008 legislation that allows for warrantless surveillance of the emails, text messages, and internet searches of US citizens—seems to have slipped under the radar as Obama's internal security forces crank up another notch on the totalitarian totem pole.

It is interesting to me that Americans can become very quickly incensed by any perceived breech of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, but then seem to pay only scant attention when the Fourth Amendment is effectively abolished before their very eyes.

http://bgr.com/2012/08/27/u-s-government-domestic-surveillance-citizens-nsa-freedom/

I think the world is in for a very bumpy ride under the aggressive policies pursued by the Obama regime so far and more so in the future. Whatever you may think of Barack Obama as a man or as a president it was all created by the advertising industry anyway, it is like trying to ascribe a personality type to Ronald McDonald or Colonel Sanders and all part of a bigger business plan which, for the sake of convenience, we call the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) after the famous think tank that conjured up Obama from nowhere not that long ago and put Africa central to any futures market map of unregulated profiteering to come.

12 comments:

  1. I remember those blogs and the theme running through them was ..... America needs a black president in order to reel in the countries of Africa and finish off the exploitation started by our ancestors...........or words to that effect. What can I say? you must be psychic :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Loretta, it is all about reading the runes really, the info is out there in abundance if we look for it and that is the real reason for closing down Multiply I think. It became a popular platform for posting alternative accounts of what is happening in the world.... Turning it into an Asian thrift shop is I think just a silly cover story, it actually makes no commercial sense at all to me to decommission anything as successful as Multiple social networks were and still are. Multiply was much too popular and too easily used to blast multiple messages across cyberspace I think. From that perspective its closure is a victory for the global information network that has got the disinformation industry (otherwise known as the corporate media) on the run..

      Thanks again for your comments, they are as ever much appreciated.

      Delete
  2. You amaze me everyday AA.

    And this all makes me want to cry :-(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for those kind comments Ms C. I hope you don't cry over all this, opening up suppressed bits of the story should really be a matter for celebration I think. It is always better to know than not to know in my opinion, it helps us to put the jigsaw together... even if we don't like the picture it makes....So dry your eyes and have fun, that's always the way forward for me I think :-D

      Delete
  3. I remember your previous blogs on Obama and Africa AA and it was very eye opening for me because I had been listening to analysis from others who were saying much the same thing. So much corroborating information just continues to pile up and your analysis was right up there at the tip of the sphere. I agreed with you then, and even more so now.

    "The reason for Barack Obama's meteoric rise to statesmanship is that he is the mascot of AFRICOM and part of the same PNAC programme that carves up the world and is currently invading Mali"

    Although we arrive from different directions, I am most definitely looking in the same direction as yourself here AA. We probably disagree on who runs the "programme" from the very top, but whatever. I'm just happy someone actually sees it and can explain it.

    Well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That last point is a very good point; I also appreciate the explanation, Aaron has the knack of assimilating the information and putting it together in a way that verifies what I usually 'feel' but would be unable substantiate in the way he does.

      Delete
  4. Thanks Scott, it is indeed interesting that we have arrived at this point apparently by completely different routes, but what is the same about us I think is a commitment to freedom of speech and expression coupled with a hatred of injustice and corruption.

    I think it is crucial to not like being lied to... or patronised by 'official' sources.

    There is a widespread global network of right thinking individuals that are everywhere and always much closer than we sometimes think. Its job is to constantly pick holes in 'official accounts' to deconstruct PSYOPS in order to neatly lay out the components of the lies for all to see and exposed lumps of ideology for people to paw over.
    We are the collective counterbalance to the 'opinion formers' ...we are those who watch the watchers, those who evaluate the quality of disinformation they produce (and joke about it)....those who deconstruct advertising techniques by following the money and checking the 'facts' that lie behind them.
    We look for patterns of behaviours and pre-empt PSYOPS by reporting them, sometimes well in advance.

    We are the ones who prove George Orwell wrong on one very fundamental point....we are not programmable and there are a lot of us embedded in all sorts of places.

    We are the de-programmers of the cult of mutant capitalism and all those arseholes it employs to seduce and/or threaten us into accepting the power of their message and the beauty of their product....yes they (these official opinion formers) really are that off beam....
    There is a new conscioussness in the world that cannot be breached, diverted or infiltrated and it will dismantle the existing status quo in due course, of this I am confident simply because that is how history always works and we are the forensic historians sharing our thoughts on the progress of our mission. Personally I like that. Thanks again Scott.

    ReplyDelete
  5. think you make some very good points here, AA. There is no question there is a new "scramble for Africa" between the US and Chinese powers, among other players.

    The wild card in all this is Islamic militancy which seems to have elements of ethnic strife and old-fashioned brigands.

    We see France intervening militarily in Mali with help from the United States in supplies and drones. It all seems not all that different from the long Vietnam War, although the scale is more different for now and the plan seems to be modest--for now.

    Go back for a moment to forty years ago--when the Internet was but a dream as a tool for regular citizens. I remember as a school kid reading and listening on other media as a debate raged about the Nixon-Kissinger bombing of Hanoi by US B-52 bombers. On one hand Nixon was hailed as a peacemaker for overtures to China (although the two powers agreed to little other than fear of the USSR in the Shanghai communique) and then Nixon was off hat in hand to Russia for a arms control deal while sparing no expense in bombing little North Vietnam to make a peace deal that had already been made a year earlier but Nixon needed to buy more time for our "national honor".

    The idea was to "pound the North Vietnamese to agree to better terms at The Paris Peace Talks". And pound they did in a old-school "bombs away" style that buried people and villages. Somehow this got Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and his North Vietnamese counterpart a Nobel Prize each, although the latter gentleman refused it.

    I bring this distant point up to show Orwellian double-think in full action. Fast forward forty years and now the B-52s, which were last used in force by NATO on the road to Kabul in 2001-02, have been replaced by these drones. The technology has changed; the mind-set is much the same.

    The drones make it possible for the US forces to prop up the corrupt and badly-run Afghan Army and give America more time to leave honorably from a war that we are losing. This is not because the US and UK forces can't fight, I believe, but because we are supporting a bad ally and no amount of firepower or training will make the Afghan people love the Karzai government, anymore than staying in Vietnam gave Saigon's military government any more credibility in the hinterlands.

    It's likely Obama or any GOP President or Congress of the future will not be able to sell the people another Vietnam or Second Iraq War anytime soon. (Hence these small CIA special ops/killer-forces injected into the area.)

    Ultimately I think the military card will be useless and the development card will be everything. Hence, advantage here goes to China, since they have the capital to invest for export and know how to get a lot out of cheap labor. Obama is trying to keep the American hand in, knowing I would guess that it the USA is to play a secondary role here. Perhaps win over a tyrant here and there, much as we use to do in Latin America. Indeed countries like Uganda and Mail are the new Cubas and El Salvadors of the next century--with leaders for the US Media to try and make us fear them as the new Saddams and Fidels, or support guys like President Museveni and his no doubt charming wife as "the moral equivilent of our founding fathers". The phrase I quoted was used by Ronnie Reagan in the 80's to describe the forerunners of Taliban and Al-Queda, then fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan.

    Timely stuff, AA. Thanks for another provocative post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And let me add you hit the Constitutional paradox between Fourth and a very pen view of the Second Amendment right as well.

    The full-on NRA scare-fest to stop any changes in federal laws concerning gun sales (and cutting into the profits of gun manufacturers who already have sold 300 million guns in this nation) continues on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Doug, its like a privatised arms race.The only thing that generates more profit that war is the fear of war, or violence, or crime, or terrorism....now fear that's the fellah.....fear really does get the tax registers clinking. Hobbes horrors are being played out in a media war of all against all, who needs health insurance when your town is invaded by zombies?

      Delete
  7. May 300 million more be sold...


    AA, I must add something here in response to your "constitutional paradox".. "It is interesting to me that Americans can become very quickly incensed by any perceived breech of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, but then seem to pay only scant attention when the Fourth Amendment is effectively abolished before their very eyes"

    "Seem" being the key word here AA. I can assure you that since the un-patriot act was passed in 2001 there has been an enormous outcry in regards to the 4th being abolished and it continues to this day. The difference, and why it may seem to you that there may only be scant attention, is because our media (aside from insignifigant concern over wiretaping for an hour or two) does not care. And the international community and press, as well an independent bloggers etc etc didn't give a shit when millions of us have cried out in regards to assaults on the 4th. You see, there are no children to exploit, there is no mainstream media the world over that gives a shit about it like they do gun violence. There's no Russia, China, many in Europe, who see an opportunity to make a story out of our 4th, because, well, many of them don't enjoy the protections the 4th provides for Americans. Right now, it's just fucking trendy to hate the 2nd. It's also important to note that when the so called left, who allegedly care so much about civil liberties, became blatantly silent on the issue of the 4th as soon as Obama was elected. Their attention on the issue became as scant over night as did their anti-war stance. What a joke!

    May the 2nd Amendment contiue to be American's line in the sand and may statist hypocrite thugs rot.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for taking the discussion further Scott. I'm sure the mainstream US media doesn't care.... but outside of America the media has next to no interest at all.

    You are, of course right that in the world of infotainment, otherwise known as the corporate news industry the story just isn't sexy.

    Whereas.... (as Hollywood amply demonstrates) anytrhing to do with shooting alway was very sexy indeed.

    I would say hardly anyone you are likely to meet on an average street in England will know anything about the 4th Amendment, so I don't think there are that 'many in Europe' trying to 'make a story out of it'.
    For Americans of course the problem is that the 4th doesn't offer those protections from the arbitrary power of the state anymore, who knows whether it ever really did.... I certainly don't Scott, but the passive surrender of civil liberties in America has been a strong feature of the story, the 'sheeple' metaphor has been played widely. on the internet if not the mainstream media.

    ReplyDelete